Why the method matters in sand
Air excavation performs well in sandy and loose soils, and it keeps the excavation dry. On the Gold Coast that has real advantages. Adding water to sand can loosen the ground around a footing or pavement edge, while dry spoil can often go straight back into the hole as backfill instead of leaving site as slurry.
Hydro excavation is still the faster choice in many situations, particularly in firmer or compacted ground and on larger or deeper potholes. Dynamic is rolling out Vacvator air units across the network alongside the hydro fleet, and the method for a particular site, and whether air is available for your dates, is agreed at scoping.
Groundwater and wet excavations
Where the water table is shallow, as it often is in canal estates and beachside suburbs, any excavation that reaches it takes on water. The difference between methods then narrows, because the spoil is wet either way and the priority becomes lifting it fast enough to keep the asset in view.
Potholes in those conditions are kept small and, where possible, completed in one continuous operation, so the asset can be exposed, recorded and the hole reinstated before the sides have time to slump.
Proving services on road corridors and new estates
Much of the local NDD work sits on road corridors, where services need proving along and across an alignment before trenching begins, often with limited documentation of where assets actually run and traffic passing alongside. Traffic management is part of the scope from the start.
On new estates the question is different. Services have just gone in, and NDD confirms their as-constructed depth and position before the next trade connects or a footpath is laid over them.
Locate first, then expose
NDD lowers the risk of a service strike but does not remove it on its own. Plans are obtained through Before You Dig Australia, the site is located, which LADS can do as part of the Dynamic Group, and only then is the ground opened with the locate marks in view.